Proposed Crime Lab Architectural Program
By District Attorney
Steve Cooley
June 27, 2002
Comments Made Before Joint Powers of Authority
Mr. Chairman and Members of the Joint Power Authority. Indeed this is an
historic day. A day of opportunity.
I begin by commending those whose collaboration has brought this project this
far – the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department and others from the County of
Los Angeles, the Los Angeles Police Department and others from the City of Los
Angeles and California State University, Los Angeles. I would like to
particularly commend Sheriff Baca for his initiative and leadership in leading
the effort obtain the funding for the proposed crime lab from Governor Davis and
the state Legislature.
I would also like to acknowledge the contributions of the volunteer members
of the District Attorney’s Crime Lab Advisory Board. Eleven months ago I formed
the District Attorney’s Los Angeles Crime Lab Advisory Board to give voice to a
variety of stakeholders – a voice for those who depend on the product of the
proposed crime lab – victims and their advocates, prosecutors and, importantly,
municipal police departments who rely upon LASD for crime lab services. The
District Attorney’s Los Angeles Crime Lab Advisory Board meetings also provided
an independent forum for an open exchange of ideas, evaluation of data,
historical introspection, constructive criticism and future planning.
Based upon the work of that body I was able to provide a thoughtful,
objective, non-parochial response to the Internal Planning Unit’s April 30th
request for comments on the proposed Architectural Program. It was sent to each
of you on May 9th. It is in the packages provided to you today. I request it be
made part of today’s record.
The work of the District Attorney’s Crime Lab Advisory Board work also serves
as the basis of a short power point presentation that underscores points made in
my May 9th letter.
Earlier I characterized this day as an historic one and one of opportunity –
if a decision is made today, it will be historic no matter what the decision – a
day historic for seizing a great opportunity or a day historic for failing to do
so.
The opportunity presented, simply put, is to create the ability to use DNA
science at the investigative stage to solve certain crimes shortly after they
occur and prevent other such crimes from ever occurring – not just put
occasional frosting on a prosecutor’s case.
The opportunity presented is to stop many serial murderers and serial sexual
assaulters of women and children at once.
The opportunity presented is to have no more "Night Stalkers" - - - - no more
"Pillow Case" rapists - - - - no more "Hillside Stranglers" – why? Because of
DNA science these criminals can now often be identified after a first offense.
Richard Ramirez murdered ten people in the city and county of Los Angeles. He
also sexually assaulted many women and children in the most brutal way. There
will be others like him in the future. Will this county’s and city’s law
enforcement agencies be able to stop that future perpetrator at an early stage
of a criminal rampage?
The answer could be yes - - - - maybe - - - - or no. It depends on what you
do today.
The science is there. An adequate facility and staff to fill it are the
missing elements - - - - and long overdue.
CSI, Court TV, crime novels and the print media have made the public informed
of the potential greatness of forensic technology, especially DNA. They get
this. They want this.
Build it and they will come – young minds bent on science will come to learn
forensic sciences and apply their gained knowledge to a most noble cause.
I would like to start with a video presentation of a program recently aired
on ABC’s 20/20 and follow-up with a power point presentation underscoring and
elaborating on points made in my May 9th letter to the JPA.
Thank you.
Please read our
Privacy
Policy.
Site updated:
01 Feb 2006
© 1994-2012 Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office. All Rights Reserved.