The Three Strikes law, Penal Code Section 1170.12
(a)-(d), provides a powerful tool for obtaining life sentences in
cases involving habitual criminal offenders. However, unless used
judiciously, it also has the potential for injustice and abuse in
the form of disproportionately harsh sentences for relatively minor
crimes. The Three Strikes statutory scheme appropriately authorizes
the use of prosecutorial discretion in its implementation. As
prosecutors, it is our legal and ethical obligation to exercise this
discretion in a manner that assures proportionality, evenhanded
application, predictability and consistency. Moreover, the potential
for coercive plea-bargaining must be avoided. Penal Code Section
1170.12(d)(2) authorizes prosecutors to move to dismiss or strike a
qualifying prior felony conviction in the furtherance of justice
pursuant to Penal Code Section 1385. In this context, "in
furtherance of justice" requires consideration of the constitutional
rights of the defendant and the interests of society. (See People
v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996) 13 Cal. 4th 497 and its
progeny, e.g., People v. Williams (1998) 17 Cal. 4th 148 and
People v. Ortega (2000) 84 Cal. App. 4th 659). Proper
exercise of prosecutorial discretion protects society and preserves
confidence in and respect for the criminal justice system.
This policy supercedes all previous conflicting
policy directives concerning the Three Strikes law. It is designed
to provide clear guidelines for the exercise of prosecutorial
discretion in this important area. Special
Directive 00-02 is attached.
Implementation of this policy and its effects will
be closely monitored to assure that its objectives are being
fulfilled. If the results of this policy indicate the need for
modifications in the future, they will be promulgated accordingly.
SPECIAL DIRECTIVE
00-02
December 19, 2000
PRELIMINARY MATTERS
All qualifying prior felony convictions shall be alleged in the
pleadings pursuant to Penal Code Section 1170(d)(1). Prior to
seeking dismissal of ANY strike, the prior strike case files shall
be reviewed, if available, in order to fairly evaluate mitigating
and aggravating factors. If it is determined that proof of a prior
strike cannot be obtained or that the alleged strike is
inapplicable, dismissal of the strike shall be sought after
obtaining approval of the appropriate Head Deputy.
PRESUMED THIRD STRIKE CASES
If a defendant has two or more qualifying prior felony
convictions, the case is PRESUMED to be a Third Strike case
warranting a minimum 25 years-to-life sentence when at least one of
the new charged offenses is a serious or violent felony
or is any controlled substance charge in which an additional
enhancement pursuant to HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE Sections
11370.4 or 11379.8 is alleged.
This presumption may be rebutted. If the current offense does not
involve the use or possession of a firearm or deadly weapon, injury
to a victim, violence or the threat of violence, the Head Deputy may
authorize seeking dismissal of a strike after consideration of all
of the following:
1. Remoteness of the strikes.
2. Whether the strikes involved the use or possession of a
weapon, injury to a victim, violence or the threat of violence.
3. Whether the strikes arose from one incident or transaction,
and
4. Any other mitigating or aggravating factors enumerated in the
California Rules of Court, Rules 421 and 423.
PRESUMED SECOND STRIKE CASES
If a defendant has two or more qualifying prior felony
convictions, the case is PRESUMED to be a Second Strike case
if none of the charged offenses is a serious or violent felony
or is any controlled substance charge in which an additional
enhancement pursuant to HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE Sections
11370.4 or 11379.8 is alleged.
This presumption may be rebutted. The Head Deputy may decline to
seek dismissal of a strike if the current offense involves the use
or possession of a firearm or deadly weapon, injury to a victim,
violence or the threat of violence.
If in the judgment of the Head Deputy, factors other than those
enumerated above warrant a Third Strike sentence, that
recommendation supported by a written memorandum should be referred
to the appropriate Bureau Director for final decision. The
memorandum should include an evaluation of the seriousness of the
current crime, the facts underlying the prior convictions and the
defendant's character, background and any other aggravating and
mitigating factors set forth in the California Rules of Court, Rules
421 and 423.
In all instances where a case is pursued as a Second Strike case,
all Penal Code Section 667.5(b) priors shall be pled and proved or
admitted.
DOCUMENTATION OF THIRD STRIKE CASES
1. The Head Deputy shall prepare a Head Deputy Third Strike
Disposition report in all Third Strike Cases.
2. This report shall be prepared in every case in which the
pleadings at any stage of the proceedings allege two or more
strikes against a defendant.
3. The original report shall be placed in the District Attorney
case file. A copy shall be sent to the appropriate Bureau Director
within five days after the case is concluded. A file of all Third
Strike Disposition Reports shall be maintained in the office of the
Head Deputy.
4. If a Head Deputy authorizes dismissal of a strike in a
presumed Third Strike case, the traditional Disposition Report shall
discuss the applicability of the factors set forth in this Special
Directive.
5. If a Head Deputy authorizes prosecution as a Third Strike case
in a presumed Second Strike case, the traditional Disposition Report
shall discuss the applicability of the factors set forth in this
Special Directive.
SECOND STRIKE CASES
In a case with only one qualifying strike, the Head Deputy may
authorize seeking the dismissal of a strike in the interests of
justice and agree to an appropriate prison or probationary sentence
ONLY when:
1. The current offense is not a serious or violent felony; and
2. The strike offense occurred more than 10 years ago; and
3. The strike offense did not involve the use or possession of a
firearm or deadly weapon, injury to a victim, violence or the threat
of violence; and
4. There exist mitigating factors enumerated in the California Rules
of Court, Rules 421 and 423.
Whenever a Head Deputy authorizes seeking the dismissal of a
strike pursuant to this section, a traditional Disposition Report
shall be prepared.
CASE SETTLEMENT
The decision of whether or not to seek dismissal of a strike
SHALL be made at the earliest practicable stage. Once that decision
is made, it shall be promptly communicated to the court and defense
counsel. This procedure shall be followed even if a defendant
chooses to proceed to trial.